Skip to content

In 2026, the question for a new React Native project is not 'should we use Expo', it's 'is there a reason NOT to'. Managed Expo is the default. Here are the eight reasons to leave the default.

When Expo wins (most cases)

  • OTA updates · ship fixes without App Store review (huge for early product phase).
  • EAS Build · no local Xcode / Android Studio dance.
  • The dev client handles 95% of native module needs now with `expo-dev-client`.
  • Push, auth, storage, camera · all managed, all work cross-platform out of the box.
  • Tailwind + Reanimated + Gesture Handler all 'just work' via managed config.

When bare React Native still wins

  1. Custom native SDK you can't prebuild with EAS (rare in 2026, but exists · some payment SDKs).
  2. Deep background-task needs (BLE polling, foreground services on Android) where Expo's modules are restrictive.
  3. Extremely-constrained binary size requirements (Expo adds ~5-10 MB of framework).

When to skip React Native entirely

Three cases: heavy offline-first with complex DB sync (Swift/Kotlin CoreData/Room is 2× the dev time but 3× the predictability); games (use Unity or native); and apps with heavy platform-specific UI conventions (financial apps, health apps where native feel is the product).

Our default stack in 2026

Expo managed · TypeScript · Expo Router · NativeWind (Tailwind for RN) · Zustand · TanStack Query · Sentry · EAS Build + EAS Update. This stack shipped GlowUp (iOS + Android) in 5 weeks including App Store review.

The fastest way to resolve the Expo-vs-bare question: make a list of your 10 most critical native capabilities. Check each one on docs.expo.dev. If 9 of 10 are managed, use Expo.

ShareXLinkedIn#
Dezső Mező

By

Dezső Mező

Founder, DField Solutions

I've shipped production products from fintech to creator-tooling · for startups and enterprises, from Budapest to San Francisco.

Keep reading

RELATED PROJECTS

Would rather build together?

Let's talk about your project. 30 minutes, no strings.

Let's talk